Early on, I didn't count these milestones, but for the ones that I have: from the time I passed $10K it was another....
- 34 days to $11K, then
- 112 days to $12K, then
- 195 days to $13K
Bankroll update in the sidebar, and back to the tables.....
Whereby a highly book-read poker player tries to convert book-learnin' to profit by going from $0 to ???? online.
The combination of these two items will raise my marginal poker-tax-rate, which I will calculate as the amount of extra tax I paid due to the fact I played poker divided by the amount of money I made.
The way my year wound up, I made a profit of $4,725.62, broken up as
But as mentioned, I have to "break up" that $2,035.62 into winning and losing sessions for tax purposes, then add back in the amount of the bonus as a giant winning session. When looked at this way, the numbers are:
Note that the difference between those two numbers is exactly my profit of $4,725.62 as expected.
So, let's start with the easy part. The amount of Federal tax I will pay on this is simply my Federal marginal tax rate times my profit, since I do get to claim my Schedule A deductions. I thus pay $4,725.62 * 25% = $1,181.41 in Federal tax.
Next, the specific credit in my case is a loss of $50 in tax credit for every increase of $1,000 in AGI, or 5%. Therefore, since my AGI increased by over $16K, the amount of tax credit my poker playing cost me is $802.07 ($16,041.34 * 5%). And, no, this is not double counting anything, as this is a (lost) tax credit which is calculated after tax rates have already been applied.
Next, as mentioned Michigan taxes only on AGI, so the amount of extra Michigan tax I pay due to pokering is $16,041.34 * 4.35% = $697.80.
Adding these numbers up, my tax bill is sobering $2,681.28 larger than it would be if I didn't play at all, resulting in a marginal tax rate of 56.7% on my poker winnings. Looked at another way, all the bonus I cleared in 2008 was almost exactly enough to cover my tax bill, leaving me with "just" my profit from the tables. Believe it or not, this number is somewhere in the ballpark of what I thought it would be when I started the calculation (I had thought 50-mid 60%).
It really does give me pause on whether I should even bother to play at all. The way the tax law is set up (and due to the wacky Michigan taxation), it is entirely possible that I could wind up owing more taxes at the end of a year than I made profit.
Three quick examples:
Is it worth it? Having over half your money taken away as a (solidly?) winning player, with the risk of more-than-all your money being taken? Especially for a game that drives me crazy half the time?

I am (frankly) amazed that I've gone on two separate winning streaks of 12+ weeks, while my longest losing streaks are one of 5 weeks (but what a doozy THAT one was), one of 4 weeks, and all others are 3 weeks or less.
Most $$$ won, day
11/22/2008: +$417.67
1/5/2008: +$380.90
10/31/2008: +$363.26
10 days of +$200+ (all contained in 2008).
Most $$$ lost, day
11/5/2008: -$297.00
10/26/2008: -$248.75
1/13/2008: -$241.50
Amazingly every single one of these is within a week of my largest $$ days listed above.
11 days of -$200+, most clustered in a very small space right around -$200.
Most $$$ won, week
6/23/2008 - 6/29/2008: $560.95
3/10/2008 - 3/16/2008: $466.48
10/29/2007 - 11/4/2007: $447.31
13 weeks of $200+
Most $$$ lost, week
5/12/2008 - 5/18/2008: -$414.75
3/5/2007 - 3/11/2007: -$298.00
11/3/2008 - 11/9/2008: -$291.85
6 weeks of -$200+. That May week is a huge loss compared to other losing weeks, although immediately after it I went on a 12-consecutive-week winning streak for just over $2250. In graphical form:
Fun stuff.
Comments:
Comments:
Next, the BB graph:
Same graph in $:
Wow, so much for a short post....
I have made ~1500 BB in ~75K hands = 2.0 BB/100. And since the bonus clearing rate is 1BB/100, my overall win rate is a tidy 3 BB/100.
Although not pictured, if I could stay away from the 6-max games my results would be 1283 BB in 55K hands for 2.31 BB/100 (3.31 BB/100 post-bonus, with over 80% of those hands being $2/$4 or $3/$6 full-ring). Will I learn? Your guess is as good as mine.
My largest downswing at the tables (in blue) occurred very late in the graph as I was approaching 1500 BB. Checking the actual numbers, that was a prolonged 160 BB downswing in slightly under 9000 hands. There are also a few 120-ish BB downswings scattered in there, including a very sharp one as I approached 1100 BB for the first time - I dropped 121 BB in 2139 hands. Otherwise, nothing much to "write home about" as they say.
Now look at the red graph - the prolonged 160 BB downswing has shallowed out quite a bit - in fact, the actual "start" of the downswing occurs later since my bonus clearing (evidently) covered the first part of the downswing. That particular downswing is reduced to almost exactly 100 BB in 4800 hands. Likewise, the 121 BB downswing is reduced to just under 100 BB (as could probably be guessed - in 2139 hands, I'd clear 21.39 BB).
So as to be expected, the bonus clearing helps cushion the downswings, especially the ones that take a long time to unfold. And I was (evidently) also correct that no downswing that I've had exceeds 100 BB once bonus clearing is taken into account.
But what does that mean as far as account balances? That's really what downswings are all about, right? Seeing the palpable evidence that you have hundreds of dollars less than you used to have? Perhaps it shouldn't be that way, but I don't think I can buy a Starbucks or an iPod with a BB, only a $$. Thus:
The blue line "only" corresponds to play at the table, so although I lost a tad bit over $1,000 through play during that late downswing I already mentioned, my account balance (red) "only" suffered $640 during that timespan. The other big downswing(s) are a tad under $500.
You can also clearly see that (as mentioned last time), I am still down $200 through play in my last 18K hands, but luckily have cleared over $900 in bonus over that time. That'll buy a lot of White Chocolate Mochas, and maybe even a few iPods.










